Nuke Attack Better Than Even Bet In Next 10 Years

WASHINGTON – A nuclear terrorist attack on the U.S. is better than an even bet in the next 10 years, says a former assistant secretary of defense and author of a book on the subject.

"Based on current trends, a nuclear terrorist attack on the United States is more likely than not in the decade ahead," says Graham Allison, director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and author of "Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe."

More at:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56524
------------------------------------------------------

This is not idle chatter. In fact, technologically, it is not all that difficult for groups with the finances AQ has.

Buzzy wrote:WASHINGTON – A nuclear terrorist attack on the U.S. is better than an even bet in the next 10 years, says a former assistant secretary of defense and author of a book on the subject.

"Based on current trends, a nuclear terrorist attack on the United States is more likely than not in the decade ahead," says Graham Allison, director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government and author of "Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe."

More at:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56524
------------------------------------------------------

I don't give it 10 years. It will probably be within 5 years at the latest.

I'll bet the DEMs are praying there isn't an attack between now and November 2008. That would rock their boat to the core.